(PC) Beaton v. U.S. Immigration et al
Filing
3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the SACRAMENTO Division of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/11/2019. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
PAUL NIVARD BEATON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
Case No. 1:19-cv-01418 JDP
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
U.S. IMMIGRATION, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42
17
U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
18
In his complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants. The alleged
19
violations took place in Solano County, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the United
20
States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the complaint should have
21
been filed in the Sacramento Division.
22
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action that has not been commenced in the proper
23
court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, I will
24
transfer this action to the Sacramento Division. I will not rule on plaintiff’s request to proceed in
25
forma pauperis.
26
It is hereby ordered that:
27
28
1
1
1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
2
3
California sitting in Sacramento; and
2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be
4
filed at:
5
United States District Court
6
Eastern District of California
7
501 “I” Street, Suite 4-200
8
Sacramento, CA 95814
9
10
3. This court has not ruled on plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
Dated:
14
October 11, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
No. 205
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?