(PC)Hernandez v. Constable et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/13/2020 GRANTING defendants' 35 application to take plaintiff's deposition via remote video conference. Such deposition testimony shall be admissible to the same extent as if the deposition were taken in person. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No. 2:19-cv-02195-MCE-DB P CESAR N. HERNANDEZ, 12 13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER v. 14 15 A. CONSTABLE, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 Defendants applied ex parte for an order to take plaintiff’s deposition via remote video conference, with the plaintiff, the deposition reporter, and defense counsel in separate locations. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ application (ECF No. 21 35) is granted. Such deposition testimony shall be admissible to the same extent as if the 22 deposition were taken in person. 23 Dated: October 13, 2020 24 25 26 27 28 DLB:9/DB/prisoner-civil rights/hern2195.p depo video

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?