(PC) Casto v. Newsom et al
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/9/2020 ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations in full, and DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims against Joe Lizarraga, J. Clark-Kelso, Diaz, Jerry Brown, Gavin Newsom, Paul Covello, and R. Burton without prejudice. This matter is REFERRED back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HERSHEL WAYNE CASTO, II,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:19-cv-2209-KJM-EFB P
v.
ORDER
GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On July 20, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
21
served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and
22
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the
23
findings and recommendations.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,
24
25
602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed
26
de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law
27
by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court
28
/////
1
1
. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 20, 2020, are adopted in full;
5
2. Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Joe Lizarraga, J. Clark-Kelso, Diaz, Jerry Brown,
6
Gavin Newsom, Paul Covello, and R. Burton are dismissed without prejudice; and
7
3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial
8
9
proceedings.
DATED: September 9, 2020.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?