(PC) Poslof v. Baughman et al
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/15/2023 DENYING 27 Motion. No Orders will issue in response to future filings.(Lopez, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LONNIE LEE POSLOFF, JR.,
12
No. 2:19-cv-2243 KJN P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
ORDER
14
DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On November 6, 2023, plaintiff filed a motion to recover costs. Plaintiff claims he was
17
18
“under the impression and was told by defendant’s counsel that the filing fees were to be covered
19
by the settlement check once received.” (ECF No. 27 at 2.) However, the record reflects that this
20
action was settled at a settlement conference on October 27, 2020. (ECF No. 21.) Contrary to
21
plaintiff’s motion, the stipulation for voluntary dismissal of this action states: “Each party shall
22
bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees.” (ECF No. 22 at 2.) In addition, the stipulation
23
did not state that plaintiff was the prevailing party; rather, the parties settled the matter.
Further, on June 30, 2023, plaintiff was informed that the stipulation for dismissal did not
24
25
incorporate the terms of the settlement agreement or provide that this court retain jurisdiction
26
over the matter. 1 (ECF No. 26.)
27
28
1
The judge who held the settlement agreement also stated that plaintiff’s settlement proceeds
appear to have been properly disbursed. (ECF No. 26 at 2 n.1.)
1
1
For the above reasons, plaintiff’s motion is denied.
2
This civil rights action was closed on November 4, 2020. Plaintiff is advised that
3
documents filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in
4
response to future filings.
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
1. Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 27) is denied; and
7
2. No orders will issue in response to future filings.
8
Dated: November 15, 2023
9
10
11
12
posl2243.58
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?