(PS) Jones v. Velocity Technology Solutions et al

Filing 104

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/7/21 ORDDERING that motions 82 , 83 , 89 , 100 , 103 are rendered MOOT without any active claims and DENIED without prejudice. (Kastilahn, A)

Case 2:19-cv-02374-KJM-JDP Document 104 Filed 10/08/21 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GARRISON JONES,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

v.
VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY
SOLUTIONS, et al.,

Case No. 2:19-cv-02374-KJM-JDP (PS)
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,
TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES,
AND TO PRESENT EVIDENCE
ECF Nos. 82, 83, 89, 100, 103

Defendants.

16
17

On September 28, 2021, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to amend.

18
19

ECF No. 98. At this time, there are no claims. Thus, the pending motions for summary judgment

20

and motion to strike affirmative defenses were rendered moot. ECF Nos. 82, 83, 89.

21

Additionally, plaintiff has since filed two motions seeking to present evidence related to the moot

22

motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 100, 103. These motions are all rendered moot

23

without any active claims and denied without prejudice. ECF Nos. 82, 83, 89, 100, 103.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated:

October 7, 2021
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE