(PC) Protsman v. Warden et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/7/2021 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 28 motion for court assistance in obtaining a video of his cell, docketed as a "motion to compel". (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EUGENE RED PROTSMAN, 12 No. 2: 19-cv-2446 KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 WARDEN, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 17 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 14, 2020, the undersigned referred this action to the Post- 19 Screening ADR Project and stayed this action for 120 days. (ECF No. 20.) A settlement 20 conference is set for January 26, 2021, before Magistrate Judge Claire. (ECF No. 21.) On January 4, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the court assist him in 21 22 obtaining a video of his cell. (ECF No. 28.) This motion is docketed as a “motion to compel.” 23 (Id.) Plaintiff’s request for court assistance in obtaining a video of his cell is denied without 24 prejudice because this action is stayed. 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for court assistance in 2 obtaining a video of his cell (ECF No. 28), docketed as a “motion to compel,” is denied without 3 prejudice. 4 Dated: January 7, 2021 5 6 Prot2446.ord(2) 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?