(PC) Protsman v. Warden et al

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/7/2021 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's #28 motion for court assistance in obtaining a video of his cell, docketed as a "motion to compel". (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EUGENE RED PROTSMAN,

12

No. 2: 19-cv-2446 KJN P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

WARDEN, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant

17
18

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 14, 2020, the undersigned referred this action to the Post-

19

Screening ADR Project and stayed this action for 120 days. (ECF No. 20.) A settlement

20

conference is set for January 26, 2021, before Magistrate Judge Claire. (ECF No. 21.)
On January 4, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the court assist him in

21
22

obtaining a video of his cell. (ECF No. 28.) This motion is docketed as a “motion to compel.”

23

(Id.) Plaintiff’s request for court assistance in obtaining a video of his cell is denied without

24

prejudice because this action is stayed.

25

////

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for court assistance in

2

obtaining a video of his cell (ECF No. 28), docketed as a “motion to compel,” is denied without

3

prejudice.

4

Dated: January 7, 2021

5
6
Prot2446.ord(2)
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2