(PC) Simmons v. Pompey
Filing
26
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 9/7/2021 ORDERING plaintiff to show cause, within 21 days, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the court's local rules. Should plaintiff wish to continue with this lawsuit, he shall, within 21 days, file an opposition or statement of opposition to defendant's motion. (Yin, K)
Case 2:19-cv-02491-JDP Document 26 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JEREMIAH SIMMONS,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 2:19-cv-02491-JDP (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES
G. POMPEY,
ECF No. 23
Defendant.
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
16
17
On July 7, 2021, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 23. To date,
18
plaintiff has not filed a response.
19
In cases where a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party
20
is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more twenty-one days after the
21
date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a
22
statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the
23
motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id.
24
To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires
25
litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute
26
or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres.
27
Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439,
28
1
Case 2:19-cv-02491-JDP Document 26 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2
1
1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to
2
administer justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties. See Pagtalunan v.
3
Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1.
4
Plaintiff will be given a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for
5
his failure to timely file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion.
6
Plaintiff’s failure to respond to this order will constitute a failure to comply with a court order and
7
will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to
8
show cause within twenty-one days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute
9
and for failure to comply with the court’s local rules. Should plaintiff wish to continue with this
10
lawsuit, he shall, within twenty-one days, file an opposition or statement of opposition to
11
defendant’s motion.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
Dated:
15
16
September 7, 2021
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?