(PC) Muhammad v. Barber
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/16/2021 GRANTING 27 Motion to Proceed IFP on Appeal. (cc: USCA) (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KWESI MUHAMMAD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:19-cv-2592-TLN-EFB P
v.
ORDER
CHRISTINE BARBER,
15
Defendant.
16
Judgment was entered in this action on October 27, 2020. ECF No. 21. On November 24,
17
18
2020, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
19
on appeal. ECF No. 22 (later supplemented at ECF Nos. 25, 27). Rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules
20
of Appellate Procedure provides that a party to a district court action who desires to proceed in
21
forma pauperis on appeal must file a motion in the district court which:
(A) shows in the detail prescribed by Form 4 of the Appendix of Forms the party’s
22
23
inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs;
24
(B) claims an entitlement to redress; and
25
(C) states the issues that the party intends to present on appeal.
26
Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1). Plaintiff’s motion satisfies all three of the requirements set forth in Rule
27
24(a) and is therefore GRANTED.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma
2
pauperis on appeal (ECF Nos. 22, 25, 27) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to
3
serve a copy of this order on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
4
DATED: February 16, 2021.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?