(PC) Cloud v. Cox et al

Filing 44

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/7/2021 DENYING 43 Motion for Extension of Time and STRIKING 42 Response to Answer from the record. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOEL JAMES CLOUD, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:19-cv-2593 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COX, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. He seeks an extension of time to file a 18 response to defendants’ answer. Plaintiff did, in fact, file a response on January 4, 2021. (ECF 19 No. 42.) Plaintiff is advised that neither this court’s local rules nor the Federal Rules of Civil 20 Procedure provide for a response to the complaint. 21 Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 43) is denied and 22 plaintiff’s response to the answer (ECF No. 42) shall be stricken from the record. 23 Dated: January 7, 2021 24 25 26 DLB:9/DB/prisoner-civil rights/clou2593.strk 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?