Aland et al v. US WorldMeds LLC

Filing 30

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/24/2023 GRANTING 29 Joint Application for order GRANTING leave to exceed page limits. Defendant's brief in support of its forthcoming Motion to Dismiss and Relator's brief in opposition thereof shall not exceed 30 pages. Defendant's reply brief shall not exceed 15 pages. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the States of ARKANSAS, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, HAWAII, IOWA, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, LOUISIANA, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MONTANA, NEVADA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, NORTH CAROLINA, OKLAHOMA, RHODE ISLAND, TENNESSEE, TEXAS, VERMONT, VIRGINIA, WASHINGTON, and the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ex rel. THOMAS ALAND, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER GRANTING JOINT APPLICATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS Judge: Trial Date: Action Filed: Hon. Troy L. Nunley None Set December 27, 2019 Plaintiffs, 13 14 CASE NO. 2:19-cv-02618-TLN-KJN v. US WORLDMEDS, Defendant. THIS MATTER, having come before the Court by the Parties’ Joint Application for Order Granting Leave to Exceed Page Limits (“Joint Application”); and the Court, having considered all papers filed in support of said Joint Application: ORDERED that the Parties’ Joint Application is hereby GRANTED. Defendant’s brief in 22 support of its forthcoming motion to dismiss and Relator’s brief in opposition thereof shall not exceed 23 30 pages. Defendant’s reply brief shall not exceed 15 pages. 24 SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: April 24, 2023 26 27 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP ORDER GRANTING JOINT APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT CASE NO. 2:19-CV-02618-TLN-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?