(PS) Dmitriy v. Eastern District Court
Filing
4
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/12/2020 RECOMMENDING that this action be Dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 30 days of being served with these findings and recommendations. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
YEGOROV DMITRIY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:20-cv-0076 KJM DB PS
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
FEDERAL COURT and EASTERN
DISTRICT,
16
Defendants,
17
18
Plaintiff Yegorov Dmitriy is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to
19
the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order
20
signed April 3, 2020 plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to file an
21
amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was granted
22
sixty days from the date of that order to file an amended complaint and was specifically cautioned
23
that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner would result in a
24
recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 5.) The sixty-day period has expired, and
25
plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner.
Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned as
26
27
undeliverable plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court
28
////
1
1
apprised of plaintiff’s current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of
2
documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
3
Moreover, when a party fails to notify the court of a change of current address within
4
sixty-three days the court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Local
5
Rule 183(b). Here, more than sixty-three days have passed since plaintiff’s mail was returned and
6
plaintiff has not provided a current address.
7
8
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
9
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge
10
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within thirty days after
11
being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with
12
the court. A document containing objections should be titled “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
13
Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the
14
specified time may, under certain circumstances, waive the right to appeal the District Court’s
15
order. See Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
16
Dated: October 12, 2020
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.pro se\dmitriy0076.fta.f&rs
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?