(PS) Schmitz et al v. Asman et al
Filing
87
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/19/20 EXTENDING Defendants' deadline to respond to Plaintiffs' Amended First Set of Requests for Production of Documents by forty-five days. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
THOMAS J. SCHMITZ
DIANNE MALLIA
1753 Woodleaf Circle
Roseville, CA 95747
Telephone: (707) 694-8158
E-mail: tsfoot49@gmail.com
Plaintiffs, ProSe
XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517
Attorney General of California
JAY M. GOLDMAN, State Bar No. 168141
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
JENNIFER J. NYGAARD, State Bar No. 229494
Deputy Attorney General
1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor
P.O. Box 70550
Oakland, CA 94612-0550
Telephone: (510) 879-0802
Fax: (510) 622-2270
E-mail: Jennifer.Nygaard@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants Adams, Ashe, Andaluz,
Asman, Bradley, Branman, Brizendine,
Brockenborough, Brunkhorst, CDCR, Ceballos,
Diaz, Gipson, Heatley, J. Johnson, R. Johnson,
Kernan, Leidner, Ponciano, Ramkumar, Rekart,
Robinson, Rudas, C. Smith, M. Smith, Tebrock,
Toche, and Wanie
15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
18
19
THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al.,
2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD
20
21
v.
22
23
24
25
Plaintiffs, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS’
TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’
AMENDED FIRST SET OF REQUESTS
FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
A. ASMAN, et al.,
Defendants. Judge:
The Honorable Carolyn K.
Delaney
Trial Date:
N/A
Action Filed: January 27, 2020
26
27
Plaintiffs Thomas J. Schmitz and Dianne Mallia (“Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Ashe,
28
Andaluz, Asman, Bradley, Branman, Brizendine, Brockenborough, Brunkhorst, CDCR, Ceballos,
1
Stip. & [Proposed] Order Ext. Defs.’ Time Resp. Pls.’ Am. First Set Req. Produc. Docs. (2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD)
1
Diaz, Gipson, Heatley, J. Johnson, R. Johnson, Kernan, Leidner, Ponciano, Ramkumar, Rekart,
2
Robinson, Rudas, C. Smith, M. Smith, Tebrock, Toche, and Wanie (“Defendants”) (collectively
3
“The Parties”) stipulate and agree that Defendants may have until January 8, 2021, to respond to
4
Plaintiffs’ Amended First Set of Requests for Production of Documents served on Defendants on
5
September 27, 2020.
6
The Parties agree that good cause exists for the extension because the Court issued an Order
7
and Findings and Recommendations partially granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second
8
Amended Complaint on November 16, 2020. If the District Judge adopts the Findings and
9
Recommendations, many of Plaintiffs’ requests will be irrelevant, and some of the Defendants
10
11
whom the requests are addressed to will be dismissed from this action.
This is the second stipulation between the Parties for an extension of time for Defendants to
12
respond to Plaintiffs’ Amended First Set of Requests for Production of Documents. The parties
13
previously stipulated to a twenty-eight day extension of time for Defendants to respond to
14
Plaintiffs’ Amended First Set of Requests for Production of Documents pending the Court’s
15
ruling on Defendants’ motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 81). This stipulation extends Defendants’
16
current deadline to respond by forty-five days.
17
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: November __17__, 2020
/S/ Thomas J. Schmitz________________
Thomas J. Schmitz, Plaintiff
Dated: November __17__, 2020
/S/ Dianne Mallia___________________
Dianne Mallia, Plaintiff
Dated: November __18__, 2020
/S/ Jennifer J. Nygaard_____________
Jennifer J. Nygaard
Deputy Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants Adams, Ashe, Andaluz,
Asman, Bradley, Branman, Brizendine,
Brockenborough, Brunkhorst, CDCR, Ceballos,
Diaz, Gipson, Heatley, J. Johnson, R. Johnson,
Kernan, Leidner, Ponciano, Ramkumar, Rekart,
Robinson, Rudas, C. Smith, M. Smith, Tebrock,
Toche, and Wanie
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stip. & [Proposed] Order Ext. Defs.’ Time Resp. Pls.’ Am. First Set Req. Produc. Docs. (2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD)
1
ORDER
2
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: November 19, 2020
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
SF2020200637
91316648.docx
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stip. & [Proposed] Order Ext. Defs.’ Time Resp. Pls.’ Am. First Set Req. Produc. Docs. (2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?