(PC) Ruiz v. Woodfill et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/29/2020 ORDERING that plaintiff SHALL file any objections to 4 the findings and recommendations within 21 days of this order, at which point the matter will be SUBMITTED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-0205 KJM AC P v. ORDER D. WOODFILL, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 26, 2020, the court received a motion from plaintiff that requested, 20 21 among other things, that the court reconsider its March 11, 2020 order adopting the magistrate 22 judge’s February 3, 2020 Findings and Recommendations and denying plaintiff leave to proceed 23 in forma pauperis. ECF No. 9. In his motion, defendant explains that he was transferred from his 24 previous facility to Kern Valley State Prison (KVSP) on the day the magistrate judge’s Findings 25 and Recommendations, ECF No. 4, were delivered to him, see id. (served February 3, 2020), and 26 thus he did not receive that document. See Mot. 9 at 1. 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly plaintiff SHALL file any objections to the findings and recommendations 2 issued on February 3, 2020, ECF No. 4, within 21 days of this order, at which point the matter 3 will be SUBMITTED. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 29, 2020. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?