(PC) Ruiz v. Woodfill et al
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/15/2020 ADOPTING 25 Findings and Recommendations in full; This Action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and Plaintiffs Motions for appointment of counsel, interpreter, requests to proceed in forma pauperis, and to remove the assigned Magistrate Judge 22 , 24 , 26 are DENIED asmoot. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROGELIO MAY RUIZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:20-cv-0205 KJM AC P
v.
ORDER
D. WOODFILL, et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On November 3, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
20
21
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 25. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 26.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the
26
findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 3, 2020 (ECF No. 25), are adopted
3
in full;
4
2. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and
5
3. Plaintiff’s motions for appointment of counsel, interpreter, requests to proceed in
6
forma pauperis, and to remove the assigned magistrate judge (ECF Nos. 22, 24, 26) are denied as
7
moot.
8
DATED: December 15, 2020.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?