(CONSENT) A.B. Concrete Coating Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/16/2021 SETTING Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference for 3/24/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-00211-EFB Document 29 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 A.B. CONCRETE COATING INC., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:20-cv-211-EFB v. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 16 ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE Defendants. 17 18 19 This action has been assigned to the undersigned pursuant to the consent of the parties. ECF No. 9; see 28 U.S.C § 636(c); E.D. Cal. L.R. 305(b). 20 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, it is hereby ORDERED that: 21 1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for March 24, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. in 22 23 24 Courtroom No. 8. 2. Not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference, the parties shall file status reports1 briefly describing the case and addressing the following: 25 a. Progress in service of process; 26 b. Possible joinder of additional parties; 27 28 1 The parties are encouraged, when possible, to file a joint status report. 1 Case 2:20-cv-00211-EFB Document 29 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 3 1 c. Expected or desired amendment of pleadings; 2 d. Jurisdiction and venue; 3 e. Anticipated motions and their scheduling; 4 f. The report required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 outlining the 5 proposed discovery plan and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert witnesses; 6 7 g. Cut−off dates for discovery and law and motion, and dates for pretrial conference and trial;2 8 h. Special procedures, if any; 9 i. Estimated trial time; 10 11 j. Modifications of standard pretrial procedures due to the simplicity or complexity of the proceedings; 12 k. Whether the case is related to any other cases, including any bankruptcy cases; 13 l. Whether a settlement conference should be scheduled; 14 m. Whether counsel will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this matter 15 acting as settlement judge and waiving disqualification by virtue of his so acting, or whether they 16 prefer to have a settlement conference conducted before another judge; and 17 18 n. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this matter. 19 3. Failing to obey federal or local rules, or any order of this court, “may be grounds for 20 imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 21 inherent power of the Court” including dismissal of this action. E.D. Cal. L.R. 110. 22 ///// 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 In completing this portion of the status report(s), the parties are advised that Judge Brennan’s typical pretrial schedule requires (1) initial expert disclosures to be made within approximately sixty (60) days after the Status Conference; (2) motions to compel discovery to be noticed for hearing within approximately sixty (60) days after the expert disclosure deadline; (3) discovery to be completed within approximately thirty (30) days after the motion to compel deadline; (4) all non−discovery law and motion to be noticed for hearing within approximately sixty (60) days after the discovery completion date; (5) a final pretrial conference to be held approximately ninety (90) days after the non−discovery law and motion deadline; and (6) trial to commence approximately ninety (90) days after the final pretrial conference. 2 Case 2:20-cv-00211-EFB Document 29 Filed 02/16/21 Page 3 of 3 1 4. Counsel are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers immediately of any 2 settlement or other disposition. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 160. In addition, the parties are cautioned that 3 pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), an opposition, or a statement of non-opposition, to the granting of 4 a motion must be filed at least fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed (or continued) hearing 5 date. Local Rule 230(c) further provides that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition 6 to a motion at oral arguments if opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” 7 Moreover, Local Rule 230(i) provides that absent notice of intent to submit the matter on the 8 briefs, failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of the motion or of opposition to the motion, 9 or may result in sanctions. 10 DATED: February 16, 2021. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?