(PC) Rood v. Lockwood et al

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/20/20 DENYING 20 Motion for Disqualification. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COLTON JAMES ROOD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 No. 2:20-cv-00271-WBS-CKD ORDER ISAAC LOCKWOOD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former county inmate currently in state prison proceeding pro se and in forma 17 18 pauperis in this federal civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 4, 19 2020, plaintiff filed a request for change of venue which the court construes as a motion for 20 disqualification of the undersigned.1 ECF No. 20. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455, a magistrate 21 judge shall disqualify herself in any proceeding in which her impartiality might reasonably be 22 questioned or where she has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party. In plaintiff’s motion 23 for disqualification, he speculates that the undersigned is biased against plaintiff based upon the 24 rulings in his case. The court does not find disqualification is appropriate in this matter. 25 ///// 26 27 1 The filing date has been calculated using the prison mailbox rule. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). 28 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for disqualification (ECF 2 No. 20) is denied. 3 Dated: November 20, 2020 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/rood0271.disq.docx 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?