B.T.H. et al v. County of Modoc et al
Filing
44
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/3/2021 ORDERING that the Modoc County Defendants are authorized to take the deposition of Pamela Hinton after the 9/10/2021 discovery cutoff but before 10/15/2021. (Zignago, K.)
Case 2:20-cv-00566-JAM-AC Document 44 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Gregory B. Thomas (SBN 239870)
E-mail: gthomas@bwslaw.com
Michael A. Slater (SBN 318899)
E-mail: mslater@bwslaw.com
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP
1901 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612-3501
Tel: 510.273.8780 Fax: 510.839.9104
Attorneys for Defendants,
Modoc County, William Dowdy, Daniel Nessling,
Erik VonRader and Mike Main
Larry L. Baumbach (SBN 50086)
E-mail: llblaw@sandpipernet.com
LAW OFFICES OF LARRY L. BAUMBACH
2531 Forest Ave., Suite 100
Chico, CA 95928
Tel: 530.891.6222 Fax: 530.852.3969
Attorney for Plaintiffs,
B.T.H., a minor, T.J.H., a minor, and V.C.H., a
minor, by Guardian Ad Litem PAMELA HINTON
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
B.T.H., a minor, T.J.H., a minor, and
V.C.H., a minor, by Guardian Ad Litem
PAMELA HINTON,
Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF MODOC, MODOC
COUNTY SHERIFF MIKE
POINDEXTER, UNKNOWN MODOC
COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS,
SUPERVISORS, AND UNKNOWN
MODOC COUNTY MEDICAL CARE
PROVIDERS, and DOES 1 through 50
inclusive,
Case No. 2:20-cv-00566-JAM-DMC
STIPULATION AND ORDER
AUTHORIZING DEPOSITION OF
PAMELA HINTON AFTER SEPTEMBER
10, 2021 DISCOVERY CUTOFF AND
BEFORE OCTOBER 15, 2021
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 29]
Defendants.
26
27
Defendants Modoc County, William Dowdy, Daniel Nessling, Erik VonRader and Mike
28
Main (collectively, the “Modoc County Defendants”), and Plaintiffs B.T.H., T.J.H., and V.C.H
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENSEN , LLP
STIPULATION & ORDER
2:20-CV-00566-JAM-DMC
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
OAKLAND
Case 2:20-cv-00566-JAM-AC Document 44 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 4
1
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) (altogether collectively, the “parties”)—by and through their respective
2
attorneys of record, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 29—hereby
3
stipulate and agree as follows:
4
5
6
7
8
9
WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 33), on January 5, 2021, 1 this
Court ordered a discovery cutoff of September 10 (ECF No. 34);
WHEREAS, on August 10, the Modoc County Defendants served Plaintiffs with a notice
of Pamela Hinton’s (Plaintiffs’ Guardian Ad Litem) August 25 deposition;
WHEREAS, on August 19, counsel for Plaintiffs indicated that Pamela Hinton was
medically unavailable for deposition on August 25;
10
WHEREAS, on August 19, counsel for the parties agreed, in principle, to stipulate to the
11
Modoc County Defendants’ taking of Pamela Hinton’s deposition after the September 10
12
discovery cutoff, should it become necessary, pursuant to Rule 29;
13
14
15
16
WHEREAS, on August 24, the Modoc County Defendants served Plaintiffs with an
amended notice of Pamela Hinton’s September 9 deposition;
WHEREAS, on August 31, counsel for Plaintiffs indicated that Pamela Hinton will not
be available for deposition until the first week of October;
17
WHEREAS, the parties agree and stipulate that it will be in the best interest of the parties
18
to allow the deposition of Pamela Hinton to proceed after the September 10 discovery cutoff but
19
before October 15;
20
WHEREAS, the parties agree and stipulate that there is good cause to allow the
21
deposition of Pamela Hinton to proceed after the September 10 discovery cutoff but before
22
October 15;
23
WHEREAS, the parties agree and stipulate that this stipulation does not seek
24
modification of the current litigation deadlines as set forth in this Court’s January 5 Order (ECF
25
No. 34);
26
WHEREAS, the parties agree and stipulate that this stipulation does not prejudice either
27
28
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENSEN , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
OAKLAND
1
All dates refer to dates in 2021 unless otherwise indicated.
-2-
STIPULATION & ORDER
2:20-CV-00566-JAM-DMC
Case 2:20-cv-00566-JAM-AC Document 44 Filed 09/07/21 Page 3 of 4
1
of the parties’ rights to seek modification of the current litigation deadlines as set forth in this
2
Court’s January 5 Order (ECF No. 34);
3
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, jointly propose and
4
stipulate that the Modoc County Defendants are authorized to take the deposition of Pamela
5
Hinton after the September 10 discovery cutoff but before October 15.
6
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: September 3, 2021
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP
8
9
By:
10
11
12
/s/ Gregory B. Thomas
Gregory B. Thomas
Michael A. Slater
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF MODOC and FORMER
MODOC COUNTY SHERIFF MIKE
POINDEXTER
13
14
Dated: September 3, 2021
LAW OFFICES OF LARRY L. BAUMBACH
15
16
By:
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
/s/ Larry L. Baumbach
Larry L. Baumbach
Attorney for Plaintiffs
B.T.H., a minor, T.J.H., a minor, and
V.C.H., a minor, by Guardian Ad Litem
PAMELA HINTON
Under Eastern District of California Civil Local Rule 131(e) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 7), I attest
that I obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from all of the above signatories.
Dated: September 3, 2021
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP
By:
/s/ Michael A. Slater
Gregory B. Thomas
Michael A. Slater
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF MODOC and FORMER
MODOC COUNTY SHERIFF MIKE
POINDEXTER
25
26
27
28
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENSEN , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
OAKLAND
-3-
STIPULATION & ORDER
2:20-CV-00566-JAM-DMC
Case 2:20-cv-00566-JAM-AC Document 44 Filed 09/07/21 Page 4 of 4
ORDER
1
2
Based upon the foregoing stipulation, it is hereby ordered that the Modoc County
3
Defendants are authorized to take the deposition of Pamela Hinton after the September 10, 2021
4
discovery cutoff but before October 15, 2021.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 9/3/2021
8
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
OAK #4839-6984-0377 v1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
B URKE , W ILLIAMS &
S ORENSEN , LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
OAKLAND
-4-
STIPULATION & ORDER
2:20-CV-00566-JAM-DMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?