B.T.H. et al v. County of Modoc et al

Filing 44

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/3/2021 ORDERING that the Modoc County Defendants are authorized to take the deposition of Pamela Hinton after the 9/10/2021 discovery cutoff but before 10/15/2021. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-00566-JAM-AC Document 44 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Gregory B. Thomas (SBN 239870) E-mail: gthomas@bwslaw.com Michael A. Slater (SBN 318899) E-mail: mslater@bwslaw.com BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 1901 Harrison Street, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612-3501 Tel: 510.273.8780 Fax: 510.839.9104 Attorneys for Defendants, Modoc County, William Dowdy, Daniel Nessling, Erik VonRader and Mike Main Larry L. Baumbach (SBN 50086) E-mail: llblaw@sandpipernet.com LAW OFFICES OF LARRY L. BAUMBACH 2531 Forest Ave., Suite 100 Chico, CA 95928 Tel: 530.891.6222 Fax: 530.852.3969 Attorney for Plaintiffs, B.T.H., a minor, T.J.H., a minor, and V.C.H., a minor, by Guardian Ad Litem PAMELA HINTON 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 B.T.H., a minor, T.J.H., a minor, and V.C.H., a minor, by Guardian Ad Litem PAMELA HINTON, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF MODOC, MODOC COUNTY SHERIFF MIKE POINDEXTER, UNKNOWN MODOC COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, SUPERVISORS, AND UNKNOWN MODOC COUNTY MEDICAL CARE PROVIDERS, and DOES 1 through 50 inclusive, Case No. 2:20-cv-00566-JAM-DMC STIPULATION AND ORDER AUTHORIZING DEPOSITION OF PAMELA HINTON AFTER SEPTEMBER 10, 2021 DISCOVERY CUTOFF AND BEFORE OCTOBER 15, 2021 [Fed. R. Civ. P. 29] Defendants. 26 27 Defendants Modoc County, William Dowdy, Daniel Nessling, Erik VonRader and Mike 28 Main (collectively, the “Modoc County Defendants”), and Plaintiffs B.T.H., T.J.H., and V.C.H B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENSEN , LLP STIPULATION & ORDER 2:20-CV-00566-JAM-DMC ATTORNEYS AT LAW OAKLAND Case 2:20-cv-00566-JAM-AC Document 44 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 4 1 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) (altogether collectively, the “parties”)—by and through their respective 2 attorneys of record, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 29—hereby 3 stipulate and agree as follows: 4 5 6 7 8 9 WHEREAS, pursuant to stipulation of the parties (ECF No. 33), on January 5, 2021, 1 this Court ordered a discovery cutoff of September 10 (ECF No. 34); WHEREAS, on August 10, the Modoc County Defendants served Plaintiffs with a notice of Pamela Hinton’s (Plaintiffs’ Guardian Ad Litem) August 25 deposition; WHEREAS, on August 19, counsel for Plaintiffs indicated that Pamela Hinton was medically unavailable for deposition on August 25; 10 WHEREAS, on August 19, counsel for the parties agreed, in principle, to stipulate to the 11 Modoc County Defendants’ taking of Pamela Hinton’s deposition after the September 10 12 discovery cutoff, should it become necessary, pursuant to Rule 29; 13 14 15 16 WHEREAS, on August 24, the Modoc County Defendants served Plaintiffs with an amended notice of Pamela Hinton’s September 9 deposition; WHEREAS, on August 31, counsel for Plaintiffs indicated that Pamela Hinton will not be available for deposition until the first week of October; 17 WHEREAS, the parties agree and stipulate that it will be in the best interest of the parties 18 to allow the deposition of Pamela Hinton to proceed after the September 10 discovery cutoff but 19 before October 15; 20 WHEREAS, the parties agree and stipulate that there is good cause to allow the 21 deposition of Pamela Hinton to proceed after the September 10 discovery cutoff but before 22 October 15; 23 WHEREAS, the parties agree and stipulate that this stipulation does not seek 24 modification of the current litigation deadlines as set forth in this Court’s January 5 Order (ECF 25 No. 34); 26 WHEREAS, the parties agree and stipulate that this stipulation does not prejudice either 27 28 B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENSEN , LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW OAKLAND 1 All dates refer to dates in 2021 unless otherwise indicated. -2- STIPULATION & ORDER 2:20-CV-00566-JAM-DMC Case 2:20-cv-00566-JAM-AC Document 44 Filed 09/07/21 Page 3 of 4 1 of the parties’ rights to seek modification of the current litigation deadlines as set forth in this 2 Court’s January 5 Order (ECF No. 34); 3 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, jointly propose and 4 stipulate that the Modoc County Defendants are authorized to take the deposition of Pamela 5 Hinton after the September 10 discovery cutoff but before October 15. 6 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: September 3, 2021 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP 8 9 By: 10 11 12 /s/ Gregory B. Thomas Gregory B. Thomas Michael A. Slater Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF MODOC and FORMER MODOC COUNTY SHERIFF MIKE POINDEXTER 13 14 Dated: September 3, 2021 LAW OFFICES OF LARRY L. BAUMBACH 15 16 By: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 /s/ Larry L. Baumbach Larry L. Baumbach Attorney for Plaintiffs B.T.H., a minor, T.J.H., a minor, and V.C.H., a minor, by Guardian Ad Litem PAMELA HINTON Under Eastern District of California Civil Local Rule 131(e) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 7), I attest that I obtained concurrence in the filing of this document from all of the above signatories. Dated: September 3, 2021 BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP By: /s/ Michael A. Slater Gregory B. Thomas Michael A. Slater Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF MODOC and FORMER MODOC COUNTY SHERIFF MIKE POINDEXTER 25 26 27 28 B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENSEN , LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW OAKLAND -3- STIPULATION & ORDER 2:20-CV-00566-JAM-DMC Case 2:20-cv-00566-JAM-AC Document 44 Filed 09/07/21 Page 4 of 4 ORDER 1 2 Based upon the foregoing stipulation, it is hereby ordered that the Modoc County 3 Defendants are authorized to take the deposition of Pamela Hinton after the September 10, 2021 4 discovery cutoff but before October 15, 2021. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9/3/2021 8 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 OAK #4839-6984-0377 v1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B URKE , W ILLIAMS & S ORENSEN , LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW OAKLAND -4- STIPULATION & ORDER 2:20-CV-00566-JAM-DMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?