(PS) Mincey et al v. Puila et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/12/2020 GRANTING 16 Motion for Extension of Time. Response to complaint due within 45 days of the date of this order. (Tupolo, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 WILLIE JAMES MINCEY, JR., LINDA A. MASON-MINCY, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 No. 2:20-cv-0571 JAM DB PS ORDER v. BETTY M. PUIIA, BETTY M. COMEAU, BETTY M. COMEAU, Trustee of the Betty M. Comeau Trust Dated May 7, 2019, UNITED STATES, et al., 18 Defendants. 19 20 Plaintiffs Willie James Mincey, Jr., and Linda A. Mason-Mincy, are proceeding in this 21 action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 22 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiffs commenced this action of March 16, 2020, by 23 filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1) 24 On October 2, 2020, defendants filed an ex parte application for an extension of time to 25 respond to plaintiffs’ complaint. (ECF No. 16.) Although it is defendants’ third ex parte request 26 for an extension of time, defendants explain that the “delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic” 27 have prevented defendants from obtaining “potentially dispositive res judicata records from 28 //// 1 1 1992” held by the Federal Records Center. (ECF No. 16-1 at 1.) Good cause appearing, 2 defendants’ request for a third extension of time will be granted. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Defendants’ October 2, 2020 ex parte request for an extension of time (ECF No. 16) is 5 6 granted; and 2. Defendants shall file a response to plaintiffs’ complaint within forty-five days of the 7 date of this order. 8 Dated: October 12, 2020 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.pro se\mincey0571.eot3.ord 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?