Qualls et al v. County of Sacramento et al
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/26/21 DENYING without prejudice 7 Motion to Compel and the April 30, 2021 hearing is vacated. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
HEATHER QUALLS, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:20-cv-0612 TLN DB
ORDER
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al,
Defendants.
16
17
On April 9, 2012, defendant County of Sacramento filed a motion to compel responses
18
from plaintiff Heather Qualls and noticed the motion for hearing before the undersigned on April
19
30, 2021, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 7.) On April 23, 2021, the parties filed a
20
Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement. (ECF No. 8.)
21
Therein, plaintiffs’ counsel Kenny Giffard states he received “an e-mail” on July 9, 2020,
22
from an Allen Patatanyan, Esq., stating Patatanyan “had been retained by plaintiff Heather Qualls
23
to represent her in this case[.]” (Id. at 3.) Accordingly, plaintiffs’ counsel asserts that he “cannot
24
answer for Ms. Qualls nor respond to discovery propounded to her unless and until I am her
25
counsel.” (Id.) Attorney Giffard, however, is plaintiffs’ counsel of record. And attorney Giffard
26
has not sought leave to withdraw.
27
28
Nonetheless, on March 20, 2020, the assigned District Judge issued an Initial Pretrial
Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 2.) Pursuant to that order discovery was to be “completed no later
1
1
than two hundred forty (240) days from the date upon which the last answer may be filed with the
2
Court[.]” (Id. at 2.) “‘[C]ompleted’ means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that
3
all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by
4
appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been
5
complied with.” (Id.) Defendants filed their answer in this action on March 25, 2020, and well
6
over 240 days have passed. Indeed, on October 23, 2020, defendants filed a status report in
7
which they acknowledged that discovery closed on November 20, 2020. (ECF No. 6 at 3.) In
8
this regard, the parties’ discovery dispute is untimely.
9
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ April 9, 2021 motion to
10
compel (ECF No. 7) is denied without prejudice and the April 30, 2021 hearing is vacated.
11
Dated: April 26, 2021
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
DLB:6
DB\orders\orders.civil\qualls0612.unt.den.ord
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?