(PC)Ramos v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/14/2020 ADOPTING in full 8 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ANTONIO RAMOS, Jr.,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2: 20-cv-0971 WBS KJN P

v.

ORDER

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 29, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

20
21

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

22

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to

23

the findings and recommendations.
Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and

24
25

recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to

26

keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service

27

of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

28

/////
1

1

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

2

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

3

ORDERED that:

4

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 29, 2020 are adopted in full; and

5

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

6

Dated: October 14, 2020

7
8
9
10

Ram971.800

11
12
13

.802

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2