(PC) Reese v. County of Sacramento Office of the Public Defender et al

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/10/20 ADOPTING 5 Findings and Recommendations. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK ANTHONY REESE, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:20-cv-1059 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 20 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On July 17, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 22 were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to 24 the findings and recommendations. 25 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and 26 recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to 27 keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service 28 of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 1 2 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 3 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 4 ORDERED that: 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 17, 2020, are adopted in full; and 6 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 7 183(b). 8 Dated: September 10, 2020 9 10 11 /rees1059.800 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?