(PC) Reese v. County of Sacramento Office of the Public Defender et al

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/10/20 ADOPTING 5 Findings and Recommendations. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARK ANTHONY REESE,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:20-cv-1059 WBS KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO OFFICE
OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

19

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

20

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

21

On July 17, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

22

were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

23

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to

24

the findings and recommendations.

25

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and

26

recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to

27

keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service

28

of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
1

1
2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

3

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

4

ORDERED that:

5

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 17, 2020, are adopted in full; and

6

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule

7

183(b).

8

Dated: September 10, 2020

9
10
11

/rees1059.800

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2