Shannon v. Sacramento Job Corps Center, et al.,

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/26/21 ORDERING that the Parties are granted an extension of two (2) months during which the Parties are directed to exhaust private mediation and notify the Court no later than June 16, 2021 if they were unable to settle the case and why the Court should not schedule a settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge of this Court. (Kaminski, H).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MARK P. VELEZ, ESQ. (SBN 163484) NATALYA V. GRUNWALD, ESQ. (SBN 265084) THE VELEZ LAW FIRM 3010 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 120 Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone: (916) 774- 2720 Facsimile: (916) 774-2730 velezlaw@live.com Attorneys for Plaintiff ERIKA SHANNON 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MICHAEL G. PEDHIRNEY, Bar No. 233164 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.433.1940 mpedhirney@littler.com JOHN H. ADAMS, JR., Bar No. 253341 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 500 Capitol Mall Suite 2000 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916.830.7200 jhadams@littler.com Attorneys for Defendant ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 21 ERIKA SHANNON, Plaintiff, 22 23 24 25 Case No. 2:20-CV-01080-KJM-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME PREVIOUSLY ALLOWED BY COURT FOR THE PARTIES TO EXPLORE PRIVATE MEDIATION v. SACRAMENTO JOB CORPS CENTER, ADAMS & ASSOCIATES, INC., and DOES 1 – 50 inclusive, Defendants. 26 27 28 CASE NO. 2:20-CV-01080-KJM-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 1 1 Plaintiff ERIKA SHANNON (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 2 (“Defendant”) by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and agree as follows, and 3 request that the Court enter an order upon this stipulation: 4 WHEREAS, on or about October 22, 2020 this Court issued MINUTES for Scheduling 5 Conference, issuing an Order for the Parties to “exhaust private mediation and notify the court no later 6 than 4/16/2021 if they were unable to settle the case and why the court should not schedule a May 2021 7 settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge of this Court.” 8 WHEREAS, the Parties have been diligently involved in the discovery process. 9 WHEREAS, the Parties are seeking an extension of time to exhaust private mediation. 10 11 WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate that good cause exists for this Court to allow the Parties an additional two months in order to have sufficient time to exhaust private mediation. 12 WHEREAS, the Parties respectfully request that the Court enter an Order granting the Parties an 13 extension of two months to submit a written notice to the Court regarding the Parties’ exhaustion of 14 private mediation. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 17 18 Dated: April 21, 2021 19 THE VELEZ LAW FIRM, P.C. By: 20 21 /s/ Natalya V. Grunwald as authorized on April 21, 2021 Mark P. Velez Natalya V. Grunwald Attorneys for Plaintiff ERIKA SHANNON 22 23 24 25 Dated: April 21, 2021 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. By: 26 27 /s/ Michael G. Pedhirney Michael G. Pedhirney John H. Adams Attorneys for Defendant ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 28 CASE NO. 2:20-CV-01080-KJM-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 2 1 2 ORDER PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, the Parties are granted an extension of two 3 (2) months during which the Parties are directed to exhaust private mediation and notify the Court no 4 later than June 16, 2021 if they were unable to settle the case and why the Court should not schedule a 5 settlement conference before a Magistrate Judge of this Court. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 26, 2021. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 2:20-CV-01080-KJM-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?