(HC) Hunter v. Sacramento Superior Court
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/27/2021 ADOPTING IN FULL 43 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 30 Motion to Dismiss; and DISMISSING 15 First Amended Petition with leave to amend. Petitioner shall file a second amended petition within 30 days of the date of this order. (Rodriguez, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER,
12
No. 2:20-CV-1097-WBS-DMC-P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
SCOTT JONES,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of
17
18
habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.
On September 16, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
20
21
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file
22
objections within the time specified therein. The court construes petitioner’s subsequent filings
23
(ECF Nos. 44 and 45) as timely objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304,
25
this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,
26
the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed September 16, 2021, are adopted
4
2.
Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 30, is granted;
5
3.
Petitioner’s first amended petition, ECF No. 15, is dismissed with leave to
4.
Petitioner shall file a second amended petition within 30 days of the date of
3
6
in full;
amend; and
7
8
this order.
9
Dated: October 27, 2021
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?