(HC) Hunter v. Sacramento Superior Court
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 9/02/22 DENYING 62 Motion to reinstate findings and recommendations. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:20-CV-1097-WBS-DMC-P
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
SCOTT R. JONES,
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of
18
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s motion,
19
ECF No. 62, to “reinstate” findings and recommendations issued on February 14, 2022.
20
On February 14, 2022, the Court issued findings and recommendations that this
21
action be dismissed. See ECF No. 52. Petitioner appealed to the Ninth Circuit. See ECF No. 58.
22
On March 25, 2022, the Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction as no final
23
order had yet been issued. See ECF No. 61. The Ninth Circuit’s mandate issued on May 17,
24
2022. See ECF No. 63. Petitioner thereafter filed objections in this court to the February 14,
25
2022, findings and recommendations. Petitioner’s current motion seeks to “reinstate” the
26
February 14, 2022, findings and recommendations following the Ninth Circuit’s dismissal of his
27
appeal. Petitioner’s motion is denied as unnecessary as the findings and recommendations were
28
never vacated and the matter is currently before the District Judge following filing of Petitioner’s
1
1
2
objections.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: September 2, 2022
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?