(HC)Almeda v. Atchley

Filing 20

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/21 ADOPTING 15 Findings and Recommendations. Petitioner's First Amended Petition is denied in its entirety and dismissed. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL ALAMEDA, 12 No. 2:20-cv-01101 JAM GGH P Petitioner, 13 v. 14 M. ATCHLEY, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On January 5, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has 23 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 5, 2021, are adopted in full; 28 2. Petitioner’s First Amended Petition is denied in its entirety and dismissed; and 1 1 2 3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253. 3 4 5 DATED: April 26, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?