(PC) Rayford v. Candido
Filing
9
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/7/21 ADOPTING in full 8 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING this action, without prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
Case 2:20-cv-01141-JAM-DMC Document 9 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ADRIAN LANCE RAYFORD,
12
No. 2:20-CV-1141-JAM-DMC-P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
CANDIDO, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern
19
District of California local rules.
On July 23, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
22
within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been
23
filed.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Case 2:20-cv-01141-JAM-DMC Document 9 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 2
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed July 23, 2021, are adopted in full;
3
2.
This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and
4
5
failure to comply with court rules and orders; and
3.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.
6
7
8
9
Dated: September 7, 2021
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?