(PC) Driver v. USDC for Eastern District of California et al
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/15/2020 ADOPTING IN FULL 11 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff shall pay the required filing fees in full within 30 days of the date of this order. (Tupolo, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BILLY DRIVER, JR,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:20-CV-1158-KJM-DMC-P
v.
ORDER
US DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN
DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under
18
19
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by
20
Eastern District of California local rules.
On July 24, 2020, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations,
21
22
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
23
within the time specified therein. Plaintiff has filed timely objections to the findings and
24
recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304,
25
26
this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds
27
the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
adopted in full;
4
5
The findings and recommendations filed July 24, 2020 (ECF No. 11), are
2.
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is
3.
Plaintiff shall pay the required filing fees in full within 30 days of the date
denied; and
6
7
of this order; otherwise, plaintiff’s action will be dismissed for failure to comply with Court rules
8
and orders.
9
DATED: October 15, 2020.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?