(PS) Card v. BMW of North America, LLC

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/15/2020 ADOPTING IN FULL 4 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1 Complaint. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARNELL CARD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. No. 2:20–cv–1213–KJM–KJN (PS) ORDER (ECF No. 4) BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On July 29, 2020 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 4), 18 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 19 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 20 21 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 22 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 23 by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court 24 . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 4) are ADOPTED IN FULL; 28 ///// 1 1 2 3 4 2. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as provided by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. DATED: October 15, 2020. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?