(PC)Rigmaiden v. Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center

Filing 9

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/8/2020 ORDERING Clerk to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-01299-TLN-EFB Document 9 Filed 09/08/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODERICK RIGMAIDEN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:20-cv-1299-EFB P v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RIO COSUMNES CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 30, 2020, the court found that plaintiff had submitted a trust account 19 statement (ECF No. 6), but it has not been certified by a jail official, as required by 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1915(a)(2). ECF No. 7. 21 Accordingly, the court directed plaintiff to submit a certified trust account statement to 22 complete his request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. The court also warned plaintiff 23 that failure to do so would result in this action being dismissed. Id. The time for acting has now 24 passed and plaintiff has not submitted the certified trust account statement or otherwise responded 25 to the court’s order.1 26 1 27 28 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. Case 2:20-cv-01299-TLN-EFB Document 9 Filed 09/08/20 Page 2 of 2 1 2 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. 3 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 4 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 5 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 6 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 7 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 8 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 9 objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 10 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 11 appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 12 v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 13 Dated: September 8, 2020. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?