(PC)Watkins v. Lynch et al
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/18/2020 DENYING plaintiff's 7 motion for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
Case 2:20-cv-01360-DB Document 8 Filed 11/18/20 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MAURICE WATKINS,
11
12
13
14
No. 2:20-cv-1360 DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JEFF LYNCH, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action 42 U.S.C. §1983.
17
Plaintiff claims officers failed to protect him in violation of his Eighth Amendment. Presently
18
before the court is plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 7.)
19
In support of his motion plaintiff argues counsel should be appointed because he cannot
20
afford counsel, his imprisonment will interfere with his ability to litigate this case, and he has
21
attempted to obtain counsel on his own.
22
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require
23
counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490
24
U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the
25
voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d
26
1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990).
27
The test for exceptional circumstances requires the court to evaluate the plaintiff’s
28
likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in
1
Case 2:20-cv-01360-DB Document 8 Filed 11/18/20 Page 2 of 2
1
light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. See Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328,
2
1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Circumstances
3
common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not
4
establish exceptional circumstances that would warrant a request for voluntary assistance of
5
counsel.
6
In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances.
7
Plaintiff’s arguments amount to nothing more than circumstances common to most prisoners.
8
Therefore, the court will deny the motion without prejudice.
9
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of
10
counsel (ECF No. 7) is denied.
11
Dated: November 18, 2020
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
DB:12
DB:1/Orders/Prisoner.Civil.Rights/watk1360.31
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?