(PS) Davis v. California Department of Child Support Services

Filing 7

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/6/2020 ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING 5 Motion as moot; and DISMISSING this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LEON DAVIS, JR.,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:20-cv-01393-TLN-AC

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES,
Defendant.

16
17
18

Plaintiff Leon Davis, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), an individual proceeding pro se, filed the above-

19

entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local

20

Rule 302(c)(21).

21

On August 26, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

22

which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the

23

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff

24

has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

25

Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.

26

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

27

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

28

1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
1

1
2

Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and
recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

4

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 26, 2020 (ECF No. 6), are ADOPTED

5

IN FULL;

6

2. The pending motion (ECF No. 5) is DENIED as moot; and

7

3. This case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

DATED: October 6, 2020

10
11
12

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2