BCP Mechanical, LLC v. Anderson Burton Construction, Inc. et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/8/2021 AMENDING the dates in the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order as follows: Close of Non-Expert Discovery: 3/18/2022, Expert Witness Designation: 5/23/2022, Supplemental Expert Designation: 6/22/2022, Supplemental Disclosures and Responses: 8/22/2022, Dispositive Motion Filing Date: 9/23/2022, Notice of Trial Readiness: 30 days after ruling on last filed dispositive motion or 120 days from close of discovery. (Huang, H)

Download PDF
1 ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO A Professional Corporation 2 Anthony P. Niccoli, State Bar No. 219118 ANiccoli@aalrr.com 3 12800 Center Court Drive South, Suite 300 Cerritos, California 90703-9364 4 Telephone: (562) 653-3200 Fax: (562) 653-3333 5 Attorneys for ANDERSON BURTON CONSTRUCTION, 6 INC. and WESTERN SURETY COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 12800 CENTER COURT DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 300 CERRITOS, CALIFORNIA 90703-9364 TELEPHONE: (562) 653-3200 FAX: (562) 653-3333 ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO 7 12 13 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of BCP MECHANICAL, LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER THEREON ANDERSON BURTON CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California corporation; WESTERN SURETY COMPANY, a South Dakota corporation, Defendants. 18 19 Case No. 2:20-cv-01401-TLN-KJN Assigned to Honorable Judge Troy L. Nunley AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. 20 21 22 23 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 16(b)(4), Plaintiff and 24 Cross-Defendant BCP MECHANICAL, LLC (“BCP”), Defendant and Cross25 Complainant ANDERSON BURTON CONSTRUCTION, INC., (“ABCI”) and 26 Defendant WESTERN SURETY COMPANY (“Western Surety”; collectively the 27 “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as 28 follows: -1STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER THEREON 1 WHEREAS on July 10, 2020, BCP filed the instant action for Recovery on 2 Miller Act Payment Bond, Breach of Contract, Quantum Meruit and Open Book 3 Account related to a federal construction project for the U.S. Army Corps of 4 Engineers (the “Action”); 5 WHEREAS on September 22, 2020, ABCI filed a Cross-Claim against BCP 6 for Breach of Written Contract (the “Cross-Claim”); 7 WHEREAS on August 28, 2020, BCP filed a separate action against ABCI and 9 20CV-0388, for Recovery on Payment Bond, Breach of Written Contract, Quantum 10 Meruit, and Open Book Account on five (5) separate construction projects (the “State A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 12800 CENTER COURT DRIVE SOUTH, SUITE 300 CERRITOS, CALIFORNIA 90703-9364 TELEPHONE: (562) 653-3200 FAX: (562) 653-3333 ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO 8 Western Surety in the Superior Court for the County of San Luis Obispo, Case No. 11 Court Action”); 12 WHEREAS on July 13, 2020, the Court issued an Initial Pretrial Scheduling 13 Order (“Scheduling Order”) in the instant Action, setting forth dates for close of 14 discovery, expert designation, supplemental expert designations, etc.; 15 WHEREAS on August 10, 2021, the Parties filed a Stipulation to Amend the 16 Scheduling Order to allow the Parties additional time to mediate the claims in the 17 instant Action, the Cross-Claim and the State Court Action; 18 WHEREAS on August 11, 2021, the Court issued an order continuing dates in 19 the Scheduling Order pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation; 20 WHEREAS on September 22, 2021, the Parties attempted to reach a global 21 settlement of the instant Action, the Cross-Claim and the State Court action through 22 mediation before retired Federal District Court Judge Oliver Wanger. The Parties, 23 however, did not settle at mediation, and now believe that additional discovery is 24 necessary before settlement is possible; 25 WHEREAS the Parties wish to continue to attempt to reach global resolution 26 of all claims between them, , but due to the postponement of depositions and further 27 written discovery in favor of mediation, coupled with the impact to schedules and 28 delays caused by the continuing pandemic, the Parties seek additional time to engage -2STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER THEREON 1 in discovery and, thereafter, attempt again to reach a global settlement. 2 WHEREAS the Parties have agreed to a continuance of the Scheduling Order 3 dates to allow additional time to attempt to reach a global settlement of the instant 4 Action, the Cross-Claim and the State Court Action. 5 STIPULATION 6 The Parties hereby stipulate to amend the Scheduling Order as follows: 7 8 9 0 � 0 10 o<5 11 0 0 12 (') Q '� :=:) O:::'. z >-"I" �� o :ccry� <( ����'?� 13 0 14 >- 2:s���� __J o >- � � �� u:c;°'��--0 Z... � �� 2'.'.2.0i ZZa<--0 November 22, 2021 March 18, 2022 Expert Witness Designation January 21, 2022 May 23, 2022 Supplemental Expert Designation February 22, 2022 June 22, 2022 Supplemental Disclosures & Responses April 22, 2022 August 22, 2022 Dispositive Motion Filing Date May 23, 2022 September 23, 2022 Notice of Trial Readiness 30 days after ruling Same on last filed dispositive motion or 120 days from close of discovery o Qoo� � 15 (/) �:=uL: __J LL <( O< v, w O 0 � z <( z 0 <( <( � 2 � °' e'; gu u � <( LL Proposed Dates Current Date Close of Non-Expert Discovery 5 0 Description 16 17 18 Dated: November --, 2021 ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO Dated: November 3, 2021 COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By:��:_______,_���-_:...._____:��1--=!!---�-Steven C. C ar Sherrie M. Flynn Attorneys for BCP MEC -3STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER THEREON 1 ORDER 2 The Parties having stipulated and good cause appearing therefor, 3 IT IS SO ORDERED that the dates in the Initial Pretrial Scheduling 4 Order are amended as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Description Amended Dates Close of Non-Expert Discovery March 18, 2022 Expert Witness Designation May 23, 2022 Supplemental Expert Designation June 22, 2022 Supplemental Disclosures & Responses Dispositive Motion Filing Date August 22, 2022 September 23, 2022 Notice of Trial Readiness 30 days after ruling on last filed dispositive motion or 120 days from close of discovery 13 14 15 16 17 Dated: November 8, 2021 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER THEREON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?