Brooks v. Giorgio Armani Corp.

Filing 9

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/16/2020 ORDERING that Defendant shall have until 11/16/2020, to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KLINEDINST PC
501 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 600
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101

10
11 VALERIE BROOKS, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
GIORGIO ARMANI CORPORATION,
15 d.b.a. ARMANI EXCHANGE, a New
York Corporation; and DOES 1 to 10,
16 inclusive,
17

Case No. 2:20-cv-01483-JAM-JDP
ORDER
Judge:
Dept.:
Magistrate:

Hon. John A. Mendez
6
Hon. Jeremy D. Peterson

Defendants.

18
19

The Court has reviewed the Joint Motion For Second Extension of Time for

20 Defendant to Respond to Complaint, DKT. #8, submitted by VALERIE BROOKS
21 ("Plaintiff") and GIORGIO ARMANI CORPORATION, d.b.a ARMANI
22 EXCHANGE ("Defendant"), (collectively, the "Parties") by and through their
23 respective attorneys.
24

Good cause appearing for the extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's

25 Complaint in this matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall have
26 until November 16, 2020, to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint.
27 ////
28 ////
1
ORDER

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5
6
7

DATED: October 16, 2020

/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

8
9
10
KLINEDINST PC
501 WEST BROADWAY, SUITE 600
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER