(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/14/2020 ADOPTING 9 Findings and Recommendations in full. Petitioner's 7 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus is summarily DISMISSED. This case is CLOSED. The court DECLINES to issue certificate of appealability. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CECIL JEROME HATCHETT,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:20-cv-1524 WBS CKD P
v.
ORDER
KEN CLARK, et al.,
15
Respondents.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
17
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On September 29, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 29, 2020, are adopted in full;
3
2. Petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 7) is summarily
4
dismissed;
5
3. This case is closed; and
6
4. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. §
7
2253.
8
Dated: October 14, 2020
9
10
11
12
13
14
/hatc1524.804.hc
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?