(PC)Wells v. Newsom

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/17/21 ADOPTING in full 34 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 28 motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is DENIED. Plaintiff's 30 motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRE WELLS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-1557 WBS AC P v. ORDER GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 3, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 34. Plaintiff 23 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 35. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations issued February 3, 2021 (ECF No. 34), are 3 4 5 6 ADOPTED in full; 2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, filed November 23, 2020 (ECF No. 28), is DENIED, and 3. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, filed 7 January 4, 2021 (ECF No. 30), is DENIED. 8 Dated: February 17, 2021 9 10 11 12 13 14 well1557.804 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?