(PC)Wells v. Newsom
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/17/21 ADOPTING in full 34 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 28 motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is DENIED. Plaintiff's 30 motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANDRE WELLS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:20-cv-1557 WBS AC P
v.
ORDER
GAVIN NEWSOM, et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On February 3, 2021, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 34. Plaintiff
23
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 35.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations issued February 3, 2021 (ECF No. 34), are
3
4
5
6
ADOPTED in full;
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, filed
November 23, 2020 (ECF No. 28), is DENIED, and
3. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, filed
7
January 4, 2021 (ECF No. 30), is DENIED.
8
Dated: February 17, 2021
9
10
11
12
13
14
well1557.804
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?