Andino v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 93

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/24/2024 GRANTING 91 Request to Seal. (Becknal, R.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 SACRAMENTO DIVISION DAVID ANDINO, individually and on behalf of CASE NO. 2:20-CV-01628-DAD-AC all others similarly situated, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff, DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS v. APPLE INC., a California Company, Defendant. 16 Courtroom: Judge: 26 Hon. Allison Claire 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1614406806.2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 1614406806.2 1 Having reviewed Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Request to Seal certain portions of the 2 parties’ Fourth Joint Statement Regarding Discovery Disagreement (“Joint Statement”), Exhibits 4– 3 6, 8, 10 and 11 to the Declaration of Sue J. Nam (“Nam Declaration”), filed concurrently with the 4 Joint Statement, the Declaration of Isabelle L. Ord (“Ord Declaration”), filed concurrently with the 5 Joint Statement, and for good cause appearing, Apple’s Request to Seal is hereby GRANTED. The 6 requested portions of the Joint Statement, Exhibits 4–6, 8, 10 and 11 of the Nam Declaration, and 7 the Ord Declaration SHALL BE SEALED indefinitely and cannot be unsealed without subsequent 8 order from this Court. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: October 24, 2024 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1614406806.2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS 1614406806.2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?