Andino v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
93
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/24/2024 GRANTING 91 Request to Seal. (Becknal, R.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
DAVID ANDINO, individually and on behalf of
CASE NO. 2:20-CV-01628-DAD-AC
all others similarly situated,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
Plaintiff,
DEFENDANT APPLE INC.’S
REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS
v.
APPLE INC., a California Company,
Defendant.
16
Courtroom:
Judge:
26
Hon. Allison Claire
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1614406806.2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS
1614406806.2
1
Having reviewed Defendant Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Request to Seal certain portions of the
2
parties’ Fourth Joint Statement Regarding Discovery Disagreement (“Joint Statement”), Exhibits 4–
3
6, 8, 10 and 11 to the Declaration of Sue J. Nam (“Nam Declaration”), filed concurrently with the
4
Joint Statement, the Declaration of Isabelle L. Ord (“Ord Declaration”), filed concurrently with the
5
Joint Statement, and for good cause appearing, Apple’s Request to Seal is hereby GRANTED. The
6
requested portions of the Joint Statement, Exhibits 4–6, 8, 10 and 11 of the Nam Declaration, and
7
the Ord Declaration SHALL BE SEALED indefinitely and cannot be unsealed without subsequent
8
order from this Court.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: October 24, 2024
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1614406806.2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS
1614406806.2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?