(PS) State of California v. Ficklin
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/30/2021 ADOPTING IN FULL 8 Findings and Recommendations and DISMISSING this action without prejudice to filing in state court. CASE CLOSED. (Tupolo, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
No. 2:20-cv-1777 KJM JDP (PS)
MIKE FICKLIN,
15
ORDER
Defendant.
16
On February 11, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
17
18
were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and
19
recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States,
20
21
602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed
22
de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law
23
by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court
24
. . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
2
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 11, 2021, are ADOPTED;
3
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice to filing in state court; and
4
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
5
DATED: March 30, 2021.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?