(PS) Conerly et al v. Winn et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/14/2020 ADOPTING 4 Findings and Recommendations in full. This case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JAMES CONERLY, et al., 9 10 11 No. 2:20-cv-1833 JAM AC Plaintiffs, v. ORDER HON. JOHN P WINN, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 15 Plaintiff proceeds in this action in pro per [and in forma pauperis]. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 16 On September 16, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 17 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 18 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty one days. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has 19 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 10. 20 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 21 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 22 ORDERED that: 23 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 16, 2020, are adopted in full; 24 2. This case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 25 26 27 DATED: October 14, 2020 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?