(PS) Conerly et al v. Winn et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/14/2020 ADOPTING #4 Findings and Recommendations in full. This case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

JAMES CONERLY, et al.,

9
10
11

No. 2:20-cv-1833 JAM AC

Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER

HON. JOHN P WINN, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
14
15

Plaintiff proceeds in this action in pro per [and in forma pauperis]. The matter was
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

16

On September 16, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

17

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

18

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty one days. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has

19

filed objections to the findings and recommendations. ECF No. 10.

20

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

21

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

22

ORDERED that:

23

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 16, 2020, are adopted in full;

24

2. This case is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

25
26
27

DATED: October 14, 2020

/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

28
1