(HC)Johnson v. CDCR

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/06/21 DENYING 12 Motion to amend the petition. Petitioner shall have 14 days from the service of this order to file objections to the December 15, 2020 findings and recommendations.(Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL SAMUEL JOHNSON, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-1891 KJM AC P v. ORDER CDCR, 15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner has filed a document seeking to add additional claims and attachments to his 17 18 petition, ECF No. 12, which the court will construe as a motion to amend the petition. By findings and recommendations filed December 15, 2020, the undersigned 19 20 recommended that the petition be denied without prejudice to filing the claims in a new action 21 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 11. The request to amend the petition does not alter this 22 recommendation, as it fails to include a proposed amended petition and therefore does not 23 demonstrate that an amended petition would cure the defects identified in the findings and 24 recommendations. Moreover, to the extent the motion makes additional factual allegations, they 25 relate to plaintiff’s conditions of confinement, as do his additional requests for injunctive relief. 26 ECF No. 12 at 1-2. As outlined in the findings and recommendations, claims related to 27 petitioner’s conditions of confinement are not properly brought in habeas. See ECF No. 11 at 2. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The motion to amend the petition, ECF No. 12, is DENIED. 3 2. Petitioner shall have fourteen days from the service of this order to file objections to 4 the December 15, 2020 findings and recommendations. 5 DATED: January 6, 2021 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?