(HC) Prince v. Ramsey

Filing 33

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/19/2021 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID SWANK PRINCE,

12
13
14
15

No. 2: 20-cv-1962 TLN KJN P

Petitioner,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MICHAEL RAMSEY,
Respondent.

16
17

A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned by the

18

postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 182(f), which

19

requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

20
21

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).

22

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

24

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

25

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

26

Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within

27

fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections

28

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.
1

1

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

2

Dated: November 19, 2021

3
4
5
6
7

Pr1962.133

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2