Webster et al v. Sacramento Municipal Utility District

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 4/26/2021 ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED The Settlement Agreement between Plaintiffs and Defendant submitted to the Court as Exhibit A to the Declaration of David E. Mastagni, which is incorporated herei n by reference, is APPROVED as fair, reasonable and just in all respects as to Plaintiffs, including the award of attorneys' fees and costs. Judgment is ENTERED in this action and this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 PHILIP WEBSTER, ROY TODD,
ALBERT A. MENDOZA, NADINE
11 GRUNEICH, and DAVID MARTIN, on
behalf of themselves and all similarly
12 situated individuals,,
13
14

Plaintiffs,

Case No.: 2:20-cv-01986-WBS-DB
ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE
WITH PREJUDICE

v.

15 SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL
UTILITY DISTRICT,
16
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER
The Court has carefully reviewed the Settlement Agreement, the Joint Stipulation for
Approval of Settlement Agreement and Dismissal of Case, and the declarations submitted in
support thereof. Based on a review of the record, and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows:
1.

The Settlement Agreement between Plaintiffs PHILIP WEBSTER, et

al.(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
(“Defendant”) (collectively “Parties”), submitted to the Court as Exhibit A to the Declaration of
David E. Mastagni, which is incorporated herein by reference, is approved as fair, reasonable and

9563597.2 SA010-004

[Proposed] Order

1
2
3
4
5
6

just in all respects as to Plaintiffs, including the award of attorneys’ fees and costs;
2.

The Parties shall fully abide by and perform the Settlement Agreement in its

entirety and in accordance with its terms;
3.

The Court reserves jurisdiction over the above-captioned matter for the purposes

of enforcing the Settlement Agreement only;
4.

The Court has made no findings or determinations regarding the law, and none of

7

the materials or documents prepared or submitted in support of the Parties’ Joint Stipulation for

8

Approval of Settlement and Dismissal of Case shall constitute evidence of, or any admission of,

9

any violation of law;

10
11
12

5.

Judgment is entered in this Action and this Action is hereby DISMISSED with

PREJUDICE.
6. The Scheduling Conference set for 5/24/2021, at 01:30 PM, is hereby VACATED.

13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

Dated: April 26, 2021

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
9563597.2 SA010-004

Order