Valdez v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/6/2021 EXTENDING till 2/12/2021, that defendant's to respond to the Complaint.(Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 Joseph E. Addiego III (CA SBN 169522) Frederick A. Haist (CA SBN 211322) 2 DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 3 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 276-6500 4 Facsimile: (415) 276-6599 Email: joeaddiego@dwt.com frederickhaist@dwt.com 5 6 Attorneys for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 10 11 12 13 14 15 Mary Valdez, Plaintiff, v. J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND Case No. 2:20-cv-02033-KJM-DJP Case No. 2:20-cv-02033-KJM-JDP THIRD STIPULATION BETWEEN JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. AND MARY VALDEZ TO EXTEND CHASE’S TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND ORDER NEW RESPONSE DATE: February 12, 2021 1 Plaintiff Mary Valdez filed this action on October 12, 2020. Ms. Valdez 2 served Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. on October 13, 2020, making 3 Chase’s response originally due on November 3, 2020. Based upon the allegations 4 in the Complaint, Chase requested and Ms. Valdez initially granted Chase until 5 December 1, 2020 to investigate the claims, evaluate early settlement, and 6 determine its response to the Complaint, and granted another extension to January 7 11, 2021. The parties have preliminarily discussed settlement and believe that they 8 may be able to reach resolution without further filings and Court proceedings if 9 Chase has additional time to respond to the Complaint. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 10 The parties stipulate under Local Rule 144, with the Court’s approval, that 11 Chase’s time to respond to the Complaint is extended 32 days to February 12, 12 2021. This is the third extension Ms. Valdez has granted to Chase. The extension 13 will not affect any other date in the case. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 DATED: January 5, 2021 16 17 By: /s/ Joseph E. Addiego III Joseph E. Addiego III Frederick A. Haist Attorneys for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 18 19 20 21 DATED: January 5, 2021 22 MARTIN & BONTRAGER, APC By: /s/ G. Thomas Martin, III G. Thomas Martin, III Nicholas J. Bontrager Attorneys for Mary Valdez 23 24 25 26 Respectfully submitted, DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 DATED: January 6, 2021 28 1 THIRD STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND Case No. 2:20-CV-02033-KJM-DJP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?