(PC) Lake v. Diaz et al
Filing
13
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/26/2021 ADOPTING in FULL 11 Findings and Recommendations, and DENYING 8 Motion for Injunctive Relief. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN LAKE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:20-cv-2077 JAM DB P
v.
ORDER
RALPH DIAZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 19, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has
23
not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 19, 2021, are adopted in full; and
3
2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 8) is denied.
4
5
6
7
DATED: April 26, 2021
/s/ John A. Mendez
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?