(PS) Madariaga et al v. Freedom Mortgage & Trustee Corps

Filing 17

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/26/2021 ADOPTING 14 Findings and Recommendations in full. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with the Court's order. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

SEILA MADARIAGA and CHRISTINA
MADARIAGA,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:20-cv-02141-TLN-AC

ORDER
v.
FREEDOM MORTGAGE & TRUSTEE
CORPS,
Defendant.

17
18

Plaintiffs Seila Madariaga and Christina Madariaga (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are

19

proceeding in this action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

20

pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

21

On January 13, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

22

which were served on Plaintiffs and which contained notice to that any objections to the findings

23

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiffs have not

24

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

25

Although it appears from the file that Plaintiffs’ copy of the findings and

26

recommendations was returned, Plaintiffs were properly served. It is Plaintiffs’ responsibility to

27

keep the Court apprised of their current addresses at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f),

28

service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. E.D. Cal. L.R. 182(f).
1

1

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

2

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

3

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

4

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

5

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

6

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

7

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 13, 2021 (ECF No. 14), are

8
9
10
11
12

ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to
comply with the Court’s order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 26, 2021

13
14
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2