(PC) Shannon v. Inniss-Burton

Filing 56

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 02/02/2024 DENYING 55 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition to 50 Motion for Summary Judgment.(Lopez, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL TYRONE SHANNON,

12
13

No. 2:20-cv-02192-WBS-CKD

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

14

CHERYL INNISS-BURTON,

15

Defendant.

16
17

On January 24, 2024, plaintiff filed a document the court construes as a request for

18

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order of December 8, 2023 denying plaintiff’s motion

19

for the appointment of counsel without prejudice. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a

20

magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon

21

review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling is

22

clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

23

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

24

1. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 55) is denied.

25

2. Plaintiff is given one last extension of time to file an opposition to defendant’s motion
for summary judgment within 30 days from the date of this order.

26
27
28

3.

Plaintiff is cautioned that the failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a
statement of non-opposition may result in the granting of defendant’s motion or

1
2

dismissal of this action pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Dated: February 2, 2024

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

12/shan2192.mfr.counsel(2)+EOT(2)

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2