U.S. EEOC v. Cappo Management XXIX, Inc. et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/27/2021 GRANTING the parties until 5/17/2021 to file a Discovery Plain in accordance with L.R. 240(b) and to exchange Initial Disclosures. (Coll, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ROBERTA L. STEELE, SBN 188198 (CA) MARCIA L. MITCHELL, SBN 18122 (WA) JAMES H. BAKER, SBN 291836 (CA) U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office 450 Golden Gate Ave., 5th Floor West P.O. Box 36025 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone No. (650) 684-0950 Fax No. (415) 522-3425 james.baker@eeoc.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 12 ELIZABETH ZARAH, Esq., SBN#: 182871 (CA) ZAREH & ASSOCIATES 75 Broadway, Suite 202 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone No. (415) 830-3031 Facsimile No. (415) 830-3031 elizabeth@zarehassociates.com 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 DIANE AQUI, SBN 217087 (CA) SMITH DOLLAR PC 418 B Street, Fourth Floor Santa Rosa, CA 95401 Telephone No. (707) 522-1100 Fax No. (707) 522-1101 daqui@smithdollar.com Attorneys for Defendants 19 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 22 23 24 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 25 26 27 Plaintiff, and Case No.: 2:20-CV-02245-MCE-KJN STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SUBMIT DISCOVERY PLAN AND TO MODIFY RULE 26(F) INITIAL DISCLOSURES ARYAN RAHIMI, 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SUBMIT DISCOVERY PLAN AND TO MODIFY RULE 26(F) INITIAL DISCLOSURES 1 Case No.: 2:20-CV-02245-MCE-KJN Plaintiff-Intervenor 1 2 3 4 vs. CAPPO MANAGEMENT XXIX, INC., d/b/a HARROLD FORD, and VICTORY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC. 5 Defendants. 6 7 Plaintiff U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), Plaintiff-Intervenor 8 Aryan Rahimi (“Rahimi”) and Defendants Cappo Management XXIX, Inc. and Victory Automotive 9 Group, Inc. submit the following stipulation and request that the Court 1) extend the deadline for the 10 parties to submit a Discover Plan pursuant to Local Rule (L.R.) 240(b), 2) extend the deadline for the 11 parties to make Initial Disclosures, and 3) order that the parties may make Initial Disclosures in 12 accordance with the Northern District of California’s General Order No. 71 (Initial Discovery 13 Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action): 14 15 16 1. On April 1, 2021, the EEOC and Defendants completed their previously scheduled Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) Conference. 2. Pursuant L.R. 240(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), respectively, the EEOC and 17 Defendants must submit their proposed discovery plan and provide Initial Disclosures within 18 fourteen days after the conference, in this case, by April 15. 19 3. The EEOC and Defendants continue to meet and confer concerning discovery, 20 including the collection of Electronically Stored Information and the format of document 21 productions. 22 23 24 25 26 27 4. On April 4, Rahimi filed her Complaint in Intervention (ECF No. 16), following the Court granting her Motion to Intervene on April 1 (ECF No. 15). 5. Plaintiff-Intervenor and Defendants have not yet completed their Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) Conference. 6. In the interest of efficiency, the parties seek additional time to prepare and to submit a single discovery plan, and to make Initial Disclosures after they have negotiated the collection and 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SUBMIT DISCOVERY PLAN AND TO MODIFY RULE 26(F) INITIAL DISCLOSURES 2 Case No.: 2:20-CV-02245-MCE-KJN 1 2 production format of discovery. 7. To promote earlier disclosures of information that may facilitate a potentially prompt 3 resolution of this lawsuit, the parties also seek the Court’s permission to make Initial Disclosures in 4 accordance with the Northern District of California’s General Order No. 71 (Initial Discovery 5 Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action) (Exhibit A) instead of Rule 26(a)(1). 6 General Order No. 71, which was prepared by highly experienced employment lawyers, is intended 7 to focus disclosures “on the type of information most likely to be useful in narrowing the issues for 8 employment discrimination cases.” Id. at *1-2. By its terms, General Order 71 supersedes parties’ 9 disclosure obligations under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) for certain employment cases. Id. at *1. 10 8. Therefore, the parties seek to set as May 17, 2021, the deadline both for the parties to 11 file a Discovery Plan in accordance with L.R. 240(b), and to exchange Initial Disclosures in 12 accordance with General Order No. 71. 13 9. No other discovery deadlines will be affected by this extension. 14 10. The only prior extension or modification of the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order that 15 the parties have sought from the Court was an extension of the deadline for the EEOC and 16 Defendants to complete their Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) Conference. (ECF No. 14). 17 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: April 15, 2021 /s/ Marcia L. Mitchell Marcia L. Mitchell EEOC Supervisory Trial Attorney Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated: Authorized on April 15, 2021 /s/ Elizabeth Zareh Elizabeth Zarah Zareh and Associates Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor Dated: Authorized on April 15, 2021 /s/ Diane Aqui Diane Aqui Partner Smith Dollar PC Attorneys for Defendants 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SUBMIT DISCOVERY PLAN AND TO MODIFY RULE 26(F) INITIAL DISCLOSURES 3 Case No.: 2:20-CV-02245-MCE-KJN 1 ORDER 2 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 3 May 17, 2021, shall be the deadline for all parties to: 4 (1) File a Discovery Plan in accordance with L.R. 240(b); 5 (2) Exchange Initial Disclosures, which shall be made in accordance with Northern 6 District of California’s General Order No. 71 (Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases 7 Alleging Adverse Action). 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 27, 2021 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO SUBMIT DISCOVERY PLAN AND TO MODIFY RULE 26(F) INITIAL DISCLOSURES 4 Case No.: 2:20-CV-02245-MCE-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?