Doe v. Butte County Probation Dept. et al

Filing 107

ORDER signed by District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta on 11/22/2024 SUBSTITUTING Individual Minor A into the case as Janie Doe and CAPTIONING the matter as "JOHN DOE and JANIE DOE as individuals, and RICHARD ROE on behalf of MINOR B and MINOR C". (Kyono, V)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 8 9 10 11 12 JOHN DOE individually, and RICHARD ROE on behalf of Minor A, Minor B, and Minor C; 14 15 16 ORDER TO SUBSTITUTE A PLAINTIFF Plaintiffs, 13 Case No. 2:20-cv-02248-DJC-DMC v. BUTTE COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, ROXANNE LARA, CANDICE CARR, and DAWN HORWITZ-PERSON; 17 Judge: Honorable Daniel J. Calabretta Trial Date: None Set Action Filed: November 9, 2020 Defendants. 18 19 The parties in the above-entitled matter have filed a Joint Stipulation to Substitute a 20 Plaintiff. After consideration of the stipulation, and in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil 21 Procedure 17, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 23 1. The individual currently identified as Minor A, who is currently represented by 24 guardian ad litem Richard Roe in the above-entitled action, shall substitute into 25 the case as an individual plaintiff under the pseudonym of “Janie Doe.” 26 27 28 1 ORDER TO SUBSTITUTE A PLAINTIFF Case No.: 2:20-cv-02248-DJC-DMC 1 2. All references to Minor A in the existing pleadings and papers in the above- 2 entitled action shall hereafter be interpreted as references to plaintiff Janie 3 Doe. 4 3. The plaintiffs in the above-entitled matter shall now be captioned as “JOHN 5 DOE and JANIE DOE as individuals, and RICHARD ROE on behalf of 6 MINOR B and MINOR C.” 7 8 9 10 Dated: November 22, 2024 /s/ Daniel J. Calabretta THE HONORABLE DANIEL J. CALABRETTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER TO SUBSTITUTE A PLAINTIFF Case No.: 2:20-cv-02248-DJC-DMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?