(HC) Meza v. Pfeiffer

Filing 45

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Chi Soo Kim on 6/3/2024 GRANTING 44 Request for Extension of Time. Respondent's response is deemed timely and Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed within 14 days from the date of this Order. (Clemente Licea, O)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD MEZA, 12 13 14 No. 2:20-cv-2316 DAD CSK P Petitioner, v. ORDER CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 On May 30, 2024, respondent filed a request for leave to file a late response to petitioner’s 18 motion to vacate judgment. Good cause appearing, respondent’s request is granted, and the 19 response is deemed timely filed. Petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed fourteen days from the 20 date of this order. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Respondent’s request for an extension of time (ECF No. 44) is granted; 23 2. Respondent’s May 30, 2024 response (ECF No. 44) is deemed timely filed; and 24 3. Petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed fourteen days from the date of this order. 25 Dated: June 3, 2024 26 27 28 /1/meza2316.111 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?