(PS)Osborne v. Calvache et al
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/7/2022 ADOPTING 6 Findings and Recommendations in full, DISMISSING plaintiff's complaint without prejudice and without leave to amend. CASE CLOSED. (Coll, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHELLE OSBORNE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:20-cv-02341-KJM-JDP (PS)
v.
ORDER
JOSE CLAVACHE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On November 17, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which
17
18
were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings
19
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to
20
the findings and recommendations.
21
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
22
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
23
See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the
24
magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”).
25
Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by
26
the record and by the proper analysis.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 17, 2021, are adopted in full;
3
2. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice and without leave to amend; and
4
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
5
DATED: January 7, 2022.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?