(PC) Crump v. O'Campo et al
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/3/2021 DENYING without prejudice 45 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and to Lift Stay; GRANTING 48 Motion for Extension of Time; and ORDERING Defendant O'Campo to file a responsive pleading on or before 7/12/2021. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
STEVE CRUMP,
12
No. 2:20-cv-2343 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
ORDER
A. O’CAMPO, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with an action brought
17
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Both parties filed motions. As set forth below, plaintiff’s renewed
19
motion is denied without prejudice, and defendant O’Campo is granted an extension of time to
20
file a responsive pleading.
21
Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Injunctive Relief
22
On May 27, 2021, plaintiff again renewed his motion for preliminary injunction. 1
23
However, on March 15, 2021, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations addressing
24
plaintiff’s first motion for preliminary injunction, which was adopted by the district court on May
25
3, 2021, over plaintiff’s objections. Plaintiff’s recently renewed motion includes no new factual
26
1
27
28
On May 24, 2021, plaintiff previously renewed his motion, which was denied without prejudice
on May 28, 2021. (ECF No. 44, 46.)
In the instant motion, plaintiff also asked that the stay of this action be lifted. The stay of this
action was lifted on May 21, 2021. (ECF No. 43.)
1
1
allegations, and fails to address any of the elements required under Winter v. Natural Resources
2
Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008). Rather, in his one paragraph motion, plaintiff once
3
again repeats claims previously raised. Plaintiff’s renewed motion is denied without prejudice.
4
Defendant O’Campo’s Request for Extension
5
On June 2, 2021, defendant filed a request for extension of time to file a responsive
6
pleading. Good cause appearing, defendant’s request is granted. Defendant shall file a
7
responsive pleading on or before July 12, 2021.
8
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
9
1. Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 45) is denied without prejudice;
10
2. Defendant’s request (ECF No. 48) is granted; and
11
3. Defendant O’Campo shall file a responsive pleading on or before July 12, 2021.
12
Dated: June 3, 2021
13
14
15
/crum2343.pi3
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?